bookmark_borderFederal agencies abolishing discriminatory celebrations

Some great news from the Department of Defense and Department of Transportation:

 
 
 
 
 
View this post on Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A post shared by Rogan O’Handley (@dc_draino)

 
 
 
 
 
View this post on Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A post shared by Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson)

I’m not sure whether other departments are doing the same thing under the Trump administration (it would be great if they are), but I came across these two posts and find this truly awesome. Black History Month, Women’s History Month, AAPI Heritage Month, Hispanic Heritage Month, and American Indian Heritage Month all have one thing in common: they are discriminatory. As the post from Secretary Duffy points out, these are celebrations based on immutable traits. These months, and other similar celebrations, honor some people while ignoring and excluding others. It’s not OK to celebrate women but not men, or to celebrate black, Asian, Hispanic, and indigenous people but not white people. Celebrating some people but not others is unfair, unjust, hurtful, and morally wrong. Kudos to the Trump administration for taking a stand against this.

bookmark_borderCNN’s despicable coverage of the Washington D.C. plane crash

Over the past few weeks, I’ve progressed far enough in my recovery from PTSD to be able to occasionally watch news again. Recently, I watched coverage of President Trump’s inauguration, and also of the tragic plane crash in Washington D.C., on Fox News. As heartbreaking as the latter topic has been, it is a positive development for me personally that I am once again (to some extent, at least) able to keep up to date with the happenings in the world. 

Unfortunately, while in a public place, I had the misfortune of passing by a TV that was tuned to CNN. And it was immediately apparent that I haven’t progressed far enough in my recovery to be able to watch CNN. Perhaps I never will. I was only able to watch for a few moments before becoming so disgusted that I had to walk away, but what I saw and heard was absolutely infuriating.

“Trump baselessly blames Democrats, DEI for plane crash,” read the headline at the bottom of the screen. It’s disgraceful that CNN would choose to include the word “baselessly” in this headline. Whether or not the blame is baseless, is a value judgment. It is a matter of opinion. Some people think Trump was correct to blame Democrats and DEI for the crash, while some people think he was incorrect. By claiming that Trump was “baselessly” blaming Democrats and DEI, CNN is clearly expressing the latter opinion. But news outlets are not supposed to state opinions. They are supposed to state only facts. For CNN to express a negative opinion of Trump in its headline is despicable. The headline should read, “Trump blames Democrats, DEI for plane crash.” There’s no reason whatsoever to put the word “baselessly” in this headline.

Next, a commentator contrasted Trump’s response to the plane crash with the ways that previous presidents handled various tragedies. As images of the wreckage of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building were shown on the screen, the commentator characterized Timothy McVeigh as a “right-wing terrorist.” Seemingly unaware of the irony of his words, the commentator proceeded to lecture viewers about how Bill Clinton “brought the country together” in the wake of the bombing, rather than reacting with blame and division as Trump (allegedly) did with the plane crash.

This is ironic because mentioning McVeigh’s ideology is the antithesis of bringing the country together. Like the use of the word “baselessly” in their headline, there is absolutely no reason for CNN to mention McVeigh’s ideology. Yet this commentator went out of his way to do so. This serves no purpose other than to insult and criticize right-wing people in their entirety by implying that they, as a group, are somehow associated with terrorism and/or more likely to commit terrorist acts than people of other ideologies. The commentator should have simply characterized McVeigh as a terrorist. Like with the use of the word “baselessly,” CNN’s decision to mention McVeigh’s ideology is despicable. It is also partisan and divisive, which is hypocritical given that those are the exact qualities that the commentator criticizes Trump for displaying.

CNN is supposed to be a news station. But instead, it has become a platform for stuck-up, condescending, and self-righteous people to insult those who are different from themselves. The behavior that I witnessed in the few seconds that I watched CNN – before my disgust forced me to walk away from the TV – was nasty, cruel, pompous, judgmental, mean-spirited, and unprofessional. CNN has no right to be regarded as a legitimate news outlet until this disgraceful behavior permanently comes to an end.

bookmark_borderYou know what’s “pure hell,” Tim Walz?

According to Fox News, Minnesota governor and vice-presidential candidate Tim Walz described he and Kamala Harris’s loss as “pure hell” and said that Democrats are “fatigued.”

You know what’s pure hell? Watching the man that you love be lynched. Seeing the noose tightening around his neck, and the mob of angry bigots pulling on the rope. Hearing the sickening thud as his massive bronze body falls to the ground. Watching his murderers celebrate their “accomplishment.” Watching them stand on the pedestal where the man you love stood just seconds ago, their hands raised in sickening triumph. Watching them pose for pictures with their knees on his neck as he lies, pitifully, face down on the pavement.

Seeing police officers lined up, off to the side, watching this horrifying scene unfold, doing nothing to intervene because they were instructed not to. Hearing this atrocity – a demonstration of pure hatred for you because you are different from the majority – characterized as “understandable” and an act of “civil disobedience.” Hearing that the main perpetrator was released with no punishment, and that the other perpetrators weren’t arrested or charged to begin with.

Having to somehow continue existing, year after year, in a society that considers the above scenario to be completely acceptable. A society that doesn’t care about your pain, that doesn’t care about your feelings, that doesn’t care about your viewpoint, that doesn’t care about your perspective.

This is pure hell, Tim Walz. This is what I’ve experienced. And you caused it.

bookmark_border“There are only two genders. LOL no.”

I recently saw a social media post that stated the above, presumably referring to President Trump’s executive order stating that the federal government will only recognize two genders.

To me, this post demonstrates the hypocrisy and moral bankruptcy of trans / LGBTQ activists. To use the words “LOL no” when discussing a political, ideological, or moral issue is to treat the entire issue as a big joke. After all, “LOL” literally means “laughing out loud” or “lots of laughs.” Anyone who would make a post like this is not suffering, not upset, not hurt, not angered or sad or outraged. They’re laughing. They’re having a perfectly good time. They’re joking around. A person who was actually being harmed by a policy – a person who was actually being oppressed and whose rights were actually being violated – wouldn’t be treating it this way.

Additionally, the use of the words “LOL no” demonstrates a sense of contempt for those who think differently. The person who made this post is literally laughing at Trump’s executive order. They are treating an executive order that they disagree with as something to ridicule, something to laugh at, something to make fun of. This person’s response to an (allegedly) objectionable policy is not hurt, anger, or sadness. It’s contempt and ridicule. And that speaks volumes. Responding to others’ ideas with the words “LOL no” means that you consider yourself superior to other people. It is a way of expressing that those who think differently from you are beneath you. 

Trans / LGBTQ activists claim to be oppressed, when the fact that they make posts like this demonstrates that they are not. A person who was actually being harmed by Trump’s executive order would not be treating the order as something to ridicule, something to laugh at, something to make fun of. They would be expressing anger and pain, not laughter. Trans / LGBTQ activists claim to be motivated by the ideals of inclusion and equal treatment, when in reality they are motivated by a sense of superiority and looking down on others. A person advocating for equality would not make posts expressing contempt for those who are different from themselves. Devotees of progressive ideology frequently call Trump a bully, and claim themselves to be standing up for those who are excluded and marginalized, but posts like this demonstrate that they are the true bullies.

bookmark_borderThe people who championed lockdowns…

“The people who championed lockdowns are now very sincerely concerned about ‘concentrated power,'” points out Dave Smith in this Instagram post.

He makes an astute point. And I also feel the need to point out that, even worse than lockdowns, these very same people also championed requiring people to undergo vaccines and medical testing. Their hypocrisy would be humorous if it weren’t so infuriating.

bookmark_borderFantastic news re: 250th anniversary, statue garden, and protecting statues!

On Wednesday, President Trump signed a truly awesome executive order.

The order establishes a task force to plan an “extraordinary celebration” in honor of America’s 250th anniversary, on July 4, 2026. If Trump’s campaign speeches are any indication, the festivities will begin on Memorial Day 2025 and will include a “Great American State Fair” in Iowa, and a “Patriot Games” for high school athletes from across the country.

Additionally, the executive order re-establishes the plan to create a National Garden of American Heroes, a statue garden filled with statues of 250 historical figures. The order goes so far as to commission artists for the first 100 statues, indicating that the statue garden isn’t just an abstract hope, but is actually on the path towards becoming reality. “The National Garden will honor American heroism after dozens of monuments to Americans, including Presidents and Founding Fathers, have toppled or destroyed and never restored,” said a press release.

Speaking of statues that have been topped or destroyed and never restored, the executive order reinstates Trump’s order from 2020 that was aimed at protecting existing statues from destruction at the hands of bigots and bullies. This policy directs the Attorney General to prosecute people and groups responsible for vandalizing and/or destroying statues to the fullest extent of the law. It also withholds federal funding from state and local law enforcement agencies that fail to do the same. The AP describes this order as “reviving efforts to harshly punish those who vandalize or destroy existing statues and monuments.” This is true, and there is absolutely nothing bad about it, because harsh punishment is exactly what such people deserve.

As alluded to above, you might recall that both the plans for the statue garden and the policy strengthening punishments for anti-statue bullies existed previously thanks to an executive order that Trump signed during a dark time that feels simultaneously like yesterday and like a million years ago. (I blogged about it here.) Unfortunately, within his first few days of taking office, Biden mean-spiritedly and cruelly signed an executive order rescinding both of these policies, thereby cancelling plans for the statue garden and deliberately declining to punish the people in our country who are the most deserving of punishment. Although this new executive order doesn’t undo the unspeakable atrocities that were done, I am heartened that Trump has once again chosen to stand up for the statues.

I will never stop fighting for statues, I will never stop advocating on their behalf, I will never forget or forgive what happened to them, and I will never stop writing about them. This is what is truly important. This is what matters. And I’m truly glad that President Trump, to a significant extent, feels the same.

Sources: Newsmax, MSN/AP

bookmark_borderMt. McKinley and Gulf of America name changes take effect!

President Trump made good on his promises to rename the Gulf of Mexico, the Gulf of America, and to restore the name of Denali back to Mt. McKinley. (I blogged about the latter back in December, which you can read about here.)

As the Instagram account Italiani4Trump points out, the new name Gulf of America honors Italian explorer and navigator Amerigo Vespucci. 

 
 
 
 
 
View this post on Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A post shared by Italian Americans 4 Trump 🇺🇸🇮🇹 (@italiani4trump)

And of course, the name Mt. McKinley honors President William McKinley, who unjustly had his name removed from the tallest mountain in America by President Obama back in 2015. 

According to Fox News, Google Maps is updating its maps to reflect the new names.

 
 
 
 
 
View this post on Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A post shared by Fox News (@foxnews)

This is fantastic news, and I am truly hoping that these name changes honoring deserving historical figures are only the beginning…

bookmark_borderStatues are what Selena Gomez should be crying about

I recently saw this Instagram post from Benny Johnson about the video of Selena Gomez crying about the Trump administration’s deportations of illegal immigrants. Johnson, and various other right-leaning people whom he quotes in his post, argue that Gomez should instead be crying about all of the people killed by fentanyl overdoses, the people murdered and/or raped by illegal immigrants, and the 300,000 migrant children who have gone missing.

While I don’t agree with the sexist stereotypes in the post regarding which ages and genders of people tend to be the victims of which types of crimes (people of either gender and any age can be raped, and people of either gender can overdose on fentanyl), nor do I agree with the characterization of Gomez’s video as a “meltdown” (that’s insulting to autistic people because a meltdown is a term used to describe an autistic person’s involuntary reaction to a sensorily or otherwise overwhelming situation), I do think that the post makes some valid points. 

Riley Gaines, one of the people quoted in Johnson’s post, points out: “Laken Riley was one of many. Selena Gomez did not cry for her.”

This is true. And it reminded me of another thing that Selena Gomez did not cry about: the statues that were brutally and viciously destroyed at the hands of the BLM movement and “woke” ideology. Selena Gomez did not cry for the soldier statues whose heads were smashed to pieces with sledgehammers in Portsmouth, Virginia as people cheered and a brass band played. She did not cry for the statues hung with nooses from traffic lights in a North Carolina town. She did not cry for Christopher Columbus, lynched on the steps of the Minnesota state capitol as his murderers raised their hands in triumph and posed for photos with his pitiful, face-down body. She did not cry for Robert E. Lee when his head was sawed from his body and his face sliced off before he was placed into a white-hot furnace and reduced to molten bronze.

I’m going to stop giving examples, because thinking about these atrocities and typing the words to describe them makes me feel sick to my stomach. And these are only a few examples among hundreds. To say that I’ve cried for what happened to these statues is an understatement. Over the past four and a half years, I’ve sobbed uncontrollably on more occasions than I can count, wailed, screamed until my voice was hoarse, punched walls, thrown furniture, and shed enough tears to fill an ocean. I’ve experienced pain so intense, so agonizing, and so excruciating that it is impossible to fully describe. No words can do it justice. What happened to these statues is the most angering, saddening, heartbreaking thing that has ever taken place in the world.

For Selena Gomez to cry for what is happening with illegal immigrants, while ignoring the far worse situation that has happened and that continues to happen with statues, demonstrates a complete lack of both logic and empathy. What happened to these statues – not what is happening with illegal immigrants – is what is actually upsetting. What happened to these statues is what Selena Gomez should be crying for. In fact, what happened to these statues is what everyone should be crying for. The entire population should be unanimously shouting from the rooftops, screaming at the top of their lungs, protesting in the streets, demanding justice, for what happened to these statues. 

But Selena Gomez doesn’t care about the statues, and neither do most people. To cry about immigrants being deported, but not about the statues, demonstrates a lack of empathy on the part of both Selena Gomez and society as a whole. 

bookmark_borderMy noise sensitivities as an autistic person

The other day, my dad and I were in the waiting room of a doctor’s office, waiting for my mom to finish her appointment. The receptionist, in a rather mean and snippy tone of voice, was telling someone on the phone that they were “overdue” for their annual physical, and that they needed to come in so that the doctor could determine whether they were on an “appropriate” level of medication for their high blood pressure and diabetes.

This made me feel angry, even though this situation didn’t really have anything to do with me. I felt that the person’s right to bodily autonomy, their right to decline medical intervention, was being violated. No person should be told that they have to schedule a medical appointment on any particular time frame, or at all, for that matter. It’s their body, I thought to myself, and they should have the sole power to make decisions regarding it. I’m fortunate enough not to have any significant medical conditions. But what if I eventually get high blood pressure and/or diabetes when I get older? I wondered. Would I, like this patient, be told that I had to schedule a doctor’s appointment, whether I wanted to or not? Would my right to bodily autonomy, my right to decline medical intervention, be taken away? These are fundamental rights that should apply to everyone; they should not depend on being free of significant medical issues.

As I was thinking these angry thoughts, my dad started talking to me about a funny picture that he saw on his phone. I muttered a monosyllabic response, hoping that would be enough to end the exchange so that I could finish my thought process. But my dad kept talking, thereby drowning out the rest of the phone call.

Having two sources of auditory input at the same time – the paternalistic and authoritarian phone call plus my dad’s talking – made me feel so overstimulated that my brain physically hurt. I became sullen and non-responsive and was unable to explain to my dad (and later, my mom) why I was so upset. The feeling of physical pain in my brain lasted for hours.

Finally, I regained my ability to think coherently and was able to explain what had happened. And while mulling this topic over, I was reminded of other situations in which I’ve experienced sensory overstimulation.

Like most people on the autism spectrum, I have sensory sensitivities involving sounds and noises. But unlike most people on the autism spectrum, I don’t have any problem with crowded, busy places such as supermarkets, trains, buses, airports, or stadiums. In fact, I work in a grocery store that often becomes extremely crowded and busy, and this doesn’t bother me at all.

The thing about my sensory sensitivities is that when a sound is constant, it doesn’t bother me. A chaotic din, the buzzing of a crowd, a dull roar of noise, none of these things are any problem for me at all. It’s predictable, it’s consistent, and there’s nothing startling about it. What bothers me is sudden noises that come of out nowhere. A door slamming, a horn honking, a loud cough, a burst of laughter, or a dropped object clattering to the floor are just a few examples. These noises startle me and hurt my brain. They come out of nowhere, and I’m not expecting them.

I don’t have any problem with sirens, because they start out relatively quiet and gradually become louder as the fire truck or police car gets closer. But honking horns definitely have the potential to startle and anger me. 

Bruins games, Celtics games, public events that draw huge crowds of people… none of these things faze me. But one of my biggest pet peeves while in college was the sound of a person suddenly coughing in a hushed lecture hall while the professor was speaking. And I still cringe when looking back on the excruciating mental pain that erupted in my brain when my parents started talking amongst themselves during the TV broadcast of the opening ceremony of the Olympics.

Despite not being bothered by the aforementioned noisy grocery store, I found myself frequently stressed out by noises back when I worked in an office. I was startled every time someone’s phone rang. Additionally, to my chagrin, something about the hinges of the doors made them predisposed to slam loudly, causing me to jump out of my skin every time someone closed the door of their office. I also found my co-workers’ conversations highly distracting. My brain couldn’t help but attempt to follow what was being said, making it impossible for me to concentrate on my work if anyone was talking anywhere in my vicinity.

During the years of my 9:00-5:00 office job, I commuted via the train, which was packed during both my morning and evening commutes. Being surrounded by hundreds of noisy, chattering people didn’t bother me at all. But now, my work shifts end at 10:00 pm, and during my commute home both the train station and the train itself are quiet and deserted. Somewhat ironically, I’ve noticed that on the rare occasion that there is a person or group making significant noise, it really irritates me. A group of teenagers joking around and roughhousing, a sudden peal of shrill laughter, a young woman calling out to her friend a few feet away. Even the noise of a wheeled briefcase rolling along the ground felt loud to me after a particularly tiring workday. 

And continuing on the subject of my current job, I find that the most overstimulating part of the workday, in addition to the evening commute, is my break. The constant roar of noise in the store itself is perfectly fine… but you know what isn’t? The sound of the microwave door opening and closing, cupboard doors slamming, utensils clashing against plates, and people banging on the handle of the paper towel dispenser in the otherwise quiet break room. 

It’s something about the unexpectedness of a sudden noise in an otherwise silent environment, that startles me and hurts my brain. And there’s something about people talking in the midst of an otherwise quiet space that makes their voices impossible for my brain to filter out. I think this is what was going on with the two conversations in the doctor’s waiting room. The space was silent except for the receptionist talking, and so when my dad began talking as well, I couldn’t filter the phone call out. The effort involved in having to process two sources of sound simultaneously caused my brain to crash. Whereas the dull roar of a crowded stadium, train, bus, or grocery store is something that I can tune out easily. 

So that’s it. There’s nothing particularly profound about this post; I just wanted to share about my sensory sensitivities and how they’re similar to, and different from, other autistic people’s. If you’ve read all the way to the end of the post, I hope that you have found it interesting.